Colin Liddell

In my previous article I dared to ask the rhetorical question of whether Black genocide was something that should be contemplated. The question was asked to draw attention to the abuse of Whites in South Africa documented by the blog Boer Genocide, which contends that the country is in the early stages of a genocidal campaign that aims to eradicate the White population of South Africa.

A few facts: Since the ANC took power in 1994 approximately 800,000 Whites out of a population of 5.2 million have fled the country, while in rural areas several thousand Boers have been slaughtered on their farms, often with the kind of mutilation that would be precluded by strictly economic motives. Meanwhile the government pursues measures like racist employment legislation, increasing gun control, and the raising of special militias that have a creepily genocidal bent to them.

But all this talk of genocide has got me thinking again. Just possibly, the proponents of White genocide and the thugs who are carrying out its preliminary actions actually have a point after all; a point that is a lot bigger and wiser than the point they actually have in their heads, which is probably just a tangled ball of savage inferiority, mixed with hatred, greed, and lust.

The greater point that those blooded hands and yellowed, hate-rimmed eyes unwittingly carry is that the existence of the White race in its present form is a curse upon this planet and that until that curse is removed either bodily or spiritually the entire human race is condemned to be dragged down in an increasingly dysgenic spiral that will feed its barbarism and savagery.

We could sit here till doomsday totting up Whitey's enormous lead in the civilizational stakes, and come to the mistaken conclusion that the White race is an unmitigated blessing, but the important thing is not how big and fast your car is but in which direction it is headed. White civilization may be driving a high performance luxury car, but it is headed straight towards a cliff. Meanwhile the other races and civilizations, in their jeeps, jalopies or, in the case of the Africans, tricycles made out of tin cans, are at least trying to head in the right direction, one that the greater universe all around us, in its deep, profound, impersonal way, approves of.

Life in South Africa may gradually be reverting to the mean of the rest of Africa, but at least that mean is a Darwinian one. In other words, at its very base it is a progressive one, where weakness and stupidity are gradually, drop by bloody drop, grain by grain, penalized and leeched out of the system, however inefficiently. Left alone and with enough time, natural processes in Africa should raise up a better race, civilization, and culture than the ones currently there.

But, wherever the White race extends its hand of influence, these healthy tendencies, which sometimes take on extremely ugly forms, are curtailed in a thousand little ways, whether through charity, aid, medicine, 'democracy,' human rights, the imposition of false war or false peace, or other forms of social, political, and economic interference.

With Whitey on the scene feeding the improvident and lazy and putting local farmers out of business in the process, doing deals with the corrupt, fattening the parasites, paying off the guilt merchants, and curing self-inflicted ailments, a dysgenia is created in which the African, or any other group that comes under their baleful benevolence, has a much reduced chance of developing the kind of self-reliance and positive individual and group traits that lead to progress.

Whitey, living by these same dysgenic standards in his own shrinking lands and being a soft touch for everyone else, has perhaps harmed his own chances even more, but there is a resilience in the race that may overcome this handicap and allow it to continue spreading its dysgenic miasma far and wide for centuries and even milennia to come.

So, imagine if you will a world without Whites. Such a world would also lack bleeding heart liberalism and dog-eyed posters of starvlings that can only live through White charity. Without the White man to carry it, the White man’s burden would very quickly have to learn to stand on its own two feet or die. To us in the pampered West this all sounds terribly cruel, but unthinking, over-sentimentalized negation of cruelty, of the kind that we Whites love to indulge in, destroys ultimate hope.

Understandably, White nationalists, in their human weakness, feel a similar sentimental attachment to their race, flawed as it is, as I do myself. But, by doing so, aren’t we just taking a narrow, short-termist, even tribalistically selfish view of the greater good of humanity? Surely one of the differences between us and the idiots of 'The Left' is that they think in mere years or decades, while we think in terms of millennia or even billions of years.

If the White race, besotted with universal notions of equality, human rights, philanthropism, cake for everyone, and race guilt for itself, is a barrier to the long-term progress of the entire human race, then surely a strong case can be made for the removal of that race not only from South Africa but from the entire world. The only alternative is to cure it of its unhealthy tendencies that threaten the rest of humanity, something that may or may not be possible.

What's starting to happen in South Africa is certainly not pretty, but maybe it is part of a much greater plan that only generations, millions of years hence, will properly understand.

It strikes me that one of the main things about having a good debate is how it is framed. Get that right and the chances are something good will be the outcome. However, for too long now, when we consider questions of race, especially questions concerning the Black race, we have been framing things in completely the wrong way. Instead of asking how we can make reparations for slavery, colonialism, and Apartheid or how we can equalize academic scores and incomes, we should instead be asking questions like, "Does human civilization actually need the Black race?" "Is Black genocide right?" and, if it is, "What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them?" With starting points like this, wisdom is sure to flourish, enlightenment to dawn.

This might seem shocking to the usual gang of idiots, but right now very similar questions are being booted about and nobody seems to be batting an eye, all because the questions refer to White South Africans: "Does South Africa actually need the White race?" "Is White genocide right?" and "How many of the White devils do we have to rape, kill, mutilate, and bugger before the rest of them fuck off?"

These questions are being asked and answered everyday in South Africa as any visitor to the blog Boer Genocide will attest. The blog collects and collates news stories on an unending flood of racially-motivated atrocities – a Herculean task that has to be done because no one else, least of all the Western media, is moving a muscle to do so. And it must be deeply unpleasant work too as the crimes reported are truly horrendous and disgusting. A recent and quite typical story concerned a disabled White man, Thys Henzen, 43, who was arrested on a trumped up charge, beaten by Black police, and then savagely sodomized by Black prisoners in the police cells, something that is not uncommon and which has been likened to a "war crimes pattern."

His ordeal started on 29 January 2012: he was roughly arrested that evening inside his own home, brutally assaulted, thrown into the police vehicle despite his physical frailty - and a few hours later the totally helpless Afrikaner man was dragged from his wheelchair inside the SAPS-cells—and raped with considerable violence by a black detainee: one man had held a blanket over his mouth while another sodomised him. He has been examined and given a first round of antiretroviral medicine to prevent AIDS-transfer. However—he cannot afford the entire course of medicines he would need to make sure he won’t end up with AIDS after his ordeal.  

Boer Genocide’s title works like a question, positing the end of an unfinished story: Boer Genocide…question mark! With an increasing number of Whites excluded from the job market and reduced to poverty by the government's blatantly racist employment policies, and with thousands of rural Whites murdered on their isolated homesteads, the answer to this question looks increasingly obvious.

But why should Whites even be in a position where we are forced to consider such a possibility? The White race is history's victor. We conquered Africa and the Africans on the sheer merit of the superiority of our race, culture, and society, and in a land that was largely going to waste we built an affluent and modern society capable not only of supporting a large number of our own people but also a vastly larger number of Blacks than would otherwise have been able to survive there. Of course, Black labour helped, but if that hadn’t been there, we would have imported White, Indian, or Chinese labour and have done the job anyway.

Rather than asking about White genocide, it surely makes more sense by any objective standards of utility, morality, or progress, to ask whether there should be such a thing as Black genocide.

This is not just a tit-for-tat idea either. In the changing nature of the New South Africa, which is still essentially a collection of White-created-and-maintained institutions being gradually but inexorably Africanized – i.e. corrupted, ground down, and barbarized—we see the true nature of the society that will emanate from the continuing exaltation of the Black man; a world of savagery, disease, and death, replenished by a wild, thoughtless fertility; a world that will set no store on the higher values that have characterized the civilizations created by other races.

Although there are doubtless many South African Blacks who behave in ways that we could call decent, we have to wonder how much of this is real and not affected, when savagery of the worst possible kind seems to constantly lurk under the surface in even the most banal of situations.

No doubt Lloyd Doksande and Fanie Msiza could have been passed off by liberal apologists as examples of the decent, modern Black South African, content to rise up in the new South Africa by his merits and labour, but that was before the two workers at a Wimpy restaurant in Kempton Park decided to murder their young White manager, Lambert Theron, 21, after he refused to let them 'borrow' money from the till. This murder seeps with a savagery and genocidal hatred as so many crimes against Whites do. Once the attack commenced, the purely financial motive clearly took a back seat to sheer race hatred as the two men stabbed Theron at least 30 times, kicked in his teeth, cut off his lips, and crushed his head with a meat hammer.

The basic habits, ideas, and practices that help civilization to survive and prosper in other parts of the world seem largely absent among large elements of South Africa's Black population, and it seems that it is only a matter of time before the country sinks to the level of poverty and savagery endemic in most of the rest of Africa and places like Haiti and Detroit. If this is the case, then, rather than the question of White Genocide, shouldn't the debate really be focused on whether Black Genocide is something worth considering?

Rather than getting bogged down in specific, emotionally-wrought cases like the brutal sodomization of a disabled man or the savage killing and mutilation of an honest, young manager, we really should consider the bigger picture. As we know, the world is becoming increasingly over-populated, while at the same time vital resources are being rapidly depleted. The world will be unable to support much of its future projected population growth. In fact we are probably heading for a great 'die off' in which hundreds of millions of our kind will cease to be.

With Europeans and some Asians having much less children, most of the population growth leading to this future crisis is projected to come from Africans. This is the race that history and the present example of South Africa proves is least able to take care of itself; a race that has contributed almost nothing to the pool of civilization and which even shows little inclination to stay within the bounds of that civilization; a race that also seems to harbor a potent inferiority complex and savage hatred towards the creators of that civilization; and a race that votes to keep the ANC in power, the very party that helps power their increasingly genocidal attitude towards Whites.

Maybe it’s unfair to tar every Black in South Africa with the genocidal tar brush, but the support the majority have given to the ANC at least allows a reasonable case to be made for the kind of collective racial guilt that also serves as the basis of the ANC’s efforts to pull Whites down to the level where they can be raped, sodomized, murdered and mutilated.

Nowadays English soccer supporters don't go to their stadia and tune in to Match of the Day to see 22 men running around kicking a ball. That's just the wallpaper. Judging by the media's focus, the real interest these days is in the ever present danger of a racial tiff breaking out in a league that has thrown together a myriad of different nationalities and cultures in an environment that exemplifies masculine competitiveness.

A recent highlight–Saturday's Liverpool vs. Manchester United game–featured 25 players (including 3 substitutions) with 18 Whites (11 from the British Isles), four Blacks, and three mixed-race players. While this game was not without sporting interest, the real talking point was the refusal of the Uruguayan player Luis Suarez to shake hands with the Senegalese-born Patrice Evra, the same man whose accusations of ‘racism’ had seen Suarez banned for eight games earlier in the season.

This article was originally published on the website of Civil Liberty, an organization in the UK dedicated to fighting the tyranny of political correctness.

David Cameron's stint as prime minister has been dominated by four main political narratives:

1. Britain's opposition to the ongoing Franco-German centralization of Europe
2. The maintenance of financial credibility
3. The "Big Society"
4. The question of Scottish independence

The government's inability to stem the rising tide of immigration and the ongoing economic and social chaos this is spreading throughout the land has, in the absence of a potent British nationalist party, largely fallen off the political stage.

CasaPound is an Italian political movement that takes its name from the American poet and Fascist sympathizer, Ezra Pound. Although it is inevitably referred to as "extremist," "racist," and "neo-fascist," the movement, which was founded in 2003, is in fact more complex and interesting, especially from an alternative right perspective. It takes a holistic and grass roots approach to politics, focusing on culture, community, and a variety of activities for its members, as much as on traditional street politics. This is an interview I did by email with Gianluca Iannone, the movement's leader, in early 2011 for an article I was writing.

CasaPound is still not so well known in the English-speaking countries, even by those active in right wing politics. Could you introduce your movement to our readers and describe it? How big is CasaPound? How many members and how much support do you have?

First of all, linking CasaPound to the right wing is a bit restrictive. CasaPound Italia is a political movement organized as an association for social promotion. It starts from the right and goes through the entire political panorama. Right or left are two old visions of politics, we need to give birth to a new synthesis. CPI has more than 4000 members all over Italy but the supports and sympathy we gain days after days is far larger… Just think that the Blocco Studentesco, our student organization, obtained 11,000 votes in Rome and the Province for the students’ elections.

Please tell us a little about yourself personally and your background.

I was born in August 1973 and started political activism at 14 in the Fronte della Gioventù (Youth Front) in Acca Larenzia, one of Rome's downtown neighborhood. Since then I have never stopped to be part of this world. Journalist since 1999, I worked for TV and radio stations and also wrote for national newspapers on international conflicts, literature, cinema and music.

Politicians will do anything to get elected or re-elected, so it is almost taken as a certainty that sometime between the London Olympics and the US Presidential elections, America will involve itself in a sexy little war with Iran that will rally the nation and help make the autocue-reading incumbent seem less of a brain-dead dweeb than he obviously is.

The war will doubtless have the ostensible goal of "demilitarizing" the Straits of Hormuz and "safeguarding the World economy," while also taking the opportunity to blow up anything that might one day help Iran impinge on Israel’s nuclear weapon monopoly in the Middle East.

Over in the UK, the anointed dweeb is still trying to get his foot in the door.

When he was chosen leader of the opposition Labour Party in 2010, Ed Miliband benefited from the fact that everybody was trying not to elect his better known brother, David, to the position. The next step to power, however, requires persuading a large proportion of the British public to vote for him.

One of the legacies of the world financial crisis is that it showed how absolutely clueless pundits, politicians, and financial planners can be about the direction we are heading in. This also explains our growing fascination with the mysterious Maya and their reputation for fathoming the distant future by reading the stars and the courses of the planets.

With the great vacuum of ignorance that enshrouds the future, it is not surprising that this long dead civilization with an astronomical bent has been sucked into the role of providing gnostic hints of what is to come. It was either that or Madame Zaza’s tea leaves.

According to a lot of breathless twats on the Discovery Channel, the Mayans saw something very important lined up for 2012, namely the end of their Grand Cycle, scheduled to end on the 21st of December this year. Depending on who you speak to this will precipitate either the end of the universe in a cataclysm of fire, a new age with everyone being very nice to each other, or the election of Ron Paul as President of the United States.

But before we get carried away with the impending sense of momentous cosmic change, shouldn’t we pause to ask the all-important question, “Who the heck were the Maya?” just in case they turn out to be a bunch of jungle bums stoked up on fermented coconut juice rather than credible prognosticators of the end of humanity.

Following the Emma West "tram rage" incident, another video has been going viral on YouTube, this one features a foul-mouthed tirade by another ill-mannered member of an underclass, one David Cameron, Prime Minister of Great Britain, who upset a room full of Euro-insiders with his ungracious comments about European fiscal union. This vile 'Euro-chav,' who thankfully only represents a tiny minority of hundreds of millions of Eurosceptics in every part of the EU, has now been reduced to the "Lone Man of Europe" and has had his Lib-Dem coalition partners taken into protective custody.

This is an article of mine that was published in the Japanese English-speaking media back in 2005. In addition to evolutionary differences in DNA as a driver of HBD, it also posits faster biologial diversification through something called "neoteny."  Much of the political agenda of Liberal globalists and the Left is based on the view that we can't be all that different from each other having "branched out" from Africa a mere 60,000 years ago, giving us very little time to evolve significant racial differences. This theory of neoteny, which is still admittedly in its speculative stage, could represent a useful addition to the armoury of those who believe that differences between human groups are more substantial and should be recognized and respected in our social and political organization.

General Douglas MacArthur famously said that Japan was a nation of 12-year-olds. Well, he wasn't talking about fighting abilities, as the Japanese gave the Allies the fright of their lives in World War II. Nor could such a remark have applied to their level of intelligence, as Japanese consistently outscore Westerners by an average of 5 to 6 points in international IQ comparisons. Nor was it their business acumen, as, starting from the bombed out ruins of 1945, these "12-year-olds" built their economy into the second biggest in the world in a few decades. So, what the heck was MacArthur talking about? Whether he knew it or not, he was probably talking about neoteny.

Neoteny is a biological term that describes the retention of juvenile characteristics in adults, something that is widely recognized in the animal world. For example, we know that tadpoles mature into frogs, losing their juvenile aquatic character along the way. However, the axolotl species of salamander remains fully aquatic throughout its life, merely becoming a large version of a tadpole. A better known example of neoteny is the giant panda, which retains its baby-like cuteness into adulthood. Indeed, humans have juvenile characteristics relative to other primates. Our sparse body hair and enlarged heads are in fact reminiscent of baby primates.

In order to discourage similar outbreaks of native Britons complaining about their demographic displacement, Emma West (Epic Tram Lady) will probably be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Any credible charges will have to be based on what she was recorded as saying. For easy reference, here is a full transcript of the conversation, minus the occasional word or phrase that was unclear: