On September 5, CBS News's 60 Minutes reported on a unique educational institution that has been established for Black children: a “SEED School” in the District of Columbia, a school district that already has the highest per capita spending per student in the country. (For a generation, CBS News has been reporting that the most exciting educational news comes from the District, where there is always some new, fool-proof program that proves Blacks are as smart as Whites.) Typically, President Obama sees SEED as a model for the Black children of the entire country: Of educational opportunity for non-Black children, Obama says not a word.

The SEED School is a public, segregated boarding school where Black teenagers get 24-7 mentoring and enriched education. It is breathlessly noted that none of these Black children ever imagined an environment where they would be expected to do as many as two hours of homework a day (which is oddly below the national average of 3 hours a day.)

One intense Black teacher at SEED, justifying the 24-7 focus on the Black students, noted, "no one ever makes it on their own, ever." Spoken like a true lifetime recipient of Government largesse.

Remember Lori Lavorato from the “Beat Whitey Night” video I posted last week? She was the uniformed “police spokeswoman” from Iowa who tentatively hypothesized that “Beat Whitey Night” might have had “racial overtones”… 

Note that at 0:34, Lori can barely bring herself to say “b-b-black males.”

In this local news report on recent attacks at the Iowa State Fair, a White police officer ponders whether "Beat Whitey Night" might have had racial motivations... 

Conservatives might not want to think about race, but race is thinking about them. 

At any rate, it's looking like race riots will become a permanent fixture throughout America's economic collapse.  

The Washington Post has an unintentionally funny headline “Gun-toting soccer moms a scary thought in D.C. area, but not out west.”  It turns out that what’s good for Sharon and Cheryl isn’t necessarily what’s best for Shaniqua and Shantay.

PHOENIX -- In the red rock and sand of the Arizona desert, just past the retirement villages and golf greens that have made this sun-worshipping city famous, sits the biggest public shooting range in the United States.

Not far away are the Wal-Marts where Arizonans pay Sun City retirees to wait in line when a new ammo shipment arrives, lest the supply run out. Residents have the right to carry handguns openly, and starting last month residents who have no criminal records and are at least 21 also are able to carry concealed weapons just about anywhere, without the bother of getting a permit.

The full embrace of firearms is just as fervent to the north in Montana, where nearly two-thirds of all households have firearms. Montanans feel so strongly about their right to own guns for hunting, fending off grizzlies and -- if it comes to it -- fellow humans that lawmakers passed a measure last year that challenges the federal government's authority to regulate guns made and kept in their state.

This is the gun culture of the American West, and it is from here that the latest challenge to the District's firearms laws has come. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) have proposed a law that they say would sweep away overly stringent regulations imposed by the D.C. Council after the Supreme Court struck down the city's 32-year ban on handguns.

Council member Phil Mendelson (D-At Large) said the McCain-Tester bill could gut the District's regulatory powers, including laws that are stricter than most states about keeping guns away from people with records of domestic violence. He also said the law shows a disregard for the realities of the District, where guns mean drive-bys, holdups and intimidation more than sport, tradition and the American way.

"The national debate about guns just misses that they are very different cultures," Mendelson said of the District and much of the rest of the country. "It's like a psychology, a mind-set, as to how people as a group think about guns."

What does one say to this kind of journalistic malpractice?  We should at least be happy that they’re admitting that it’s the quality of the population which determines how much crime there is, not the gun laws.  On the other hand...come on!  The lie by omission is so blatant that one thinks it must smack awake the most mindless Huffington Post-reading and PBS-watching liberal. Maybe the author here is a crypto-white nationalist who wanted to make it as obvious as possible without spilling the beans and getting fired.  If so, job well done.

Elizabeth Wright tells it like it is:

So, even the supposedly tough-minded talk show host Laura Schlessinger dissolves like putty when confronted with the noise of disapproval coming from the multicultural mob, for her use of the proscribed "Nigger" word. But what else could we expect on the heels of the black woman who telephoned the show, to get advice about her own "racist" white husband, his relatives and friends?

We've learned that even the take-no-prisoners Dr. Laura now accepts the notion that there is ONE word in the English language that is allowed to be spoken by members of only ONE group. Can we expect her to join with those insufferable whites who delight in telling of their disdain for the taboo word, and how they refuse to use it under any circumstances? "I won't even say it in private," they proudly prattle on, waiting for the pat of approval.

Dr. Laura might as well join in the campaign already underway to abolish the word "Nigger" from the lips of all non-blacks. Perhaps she will endorse a federal law to punish any non-black caught spewing it. This could sort of be an expansion of the New York City Council's Resolution of 2007, in which the public use of the word was symbolically "banned." Of course, this ban has meant nothing to those blacks who practice no restraint in their use of the prohibited term and are primarily responsible for extending its life, by keeping the epithet fresh in the popular lexicon.

Here are whites running from the accursed expression, while blacks fill New York City's air with it, and even sanctify the word. The gay website Queerty.com had fun by mocking the Council's ridiculous Resolution. Claiming that New York City was soon to be a "Nigger-free zone," the editor asked, "If the council's all about cleaning up people's politically incorrect potty mouths, where are the bans on spic, faggot, kike, chink and all those other nasties?"

Of course, those "other nasties" are generally terms well known to be spewed forth by blacks, more often than by members of any other group.

Most countries in Europe already have "word crime" laws, as part of their pernicious "hate crime" packages. Why not bring such innovation to these shores and join the Europeans? But, what am I thinking? All assaults on blacks (by non-blacks, of course) are first investigated to learn whether or not the "Nigger" word was hurled before the blows came. Then, thanks to "hate crime" statutes, the assaulter can be subject to extra penalties for the use of the term. Ooh, what he said! Since most assaults on blacks are perpetrated by fellow blacks, I wonder if there are any pre-assault verbiage investigations when the perp has an abundance of melanin. Want to guess?

By retreating on this issue of free speech, do whites really think that the cowardice they have displayed since the 1960s needs to be revealed any further? It is white cowardice that gave us those facets of that 1964 Civil Rights Act, that went over the top by stifling the movement for self-sufficiency and taking the wind out of the economic sails of blacks, while forcing whites to pick up the slack. It is white cowardice that made possible that outrageously unconstitutional Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court decision. And how can we even keep count of the endless Affirmative Action and Quota laws around the land, that have undone any pretense at instilling fairness in society? All gifts of white cowardice.

Does Dr. Laura and her ilk really think the world needs any further evidence that whites are willing to submit to anything, but anything, to avoid offending black "sensitivities?" We get it. You will do anything, from overturning Articles in the Constitution, to denying free speech rights even to yourselves. We get it.

It is whites who fell to their knees in the 1960s, and have never gotten up. What fear of rioting and mayhem can do! And, even when a group declares, WE can do this, but YOU cannot, the whites' response isn't "That's what you think!" but, "Yes, Master, whatever you say." Dr. Laura confirms the three- to four-decade slide into docile obedience.

Read the rest here.

As our national economic “recovery” persists, the Black underclass, especially in the South and North East, appears to be teetering on the edge of mass unrest, even rioting. Public services are overwhelmed, and recent scenes have laid bare the very real potential for violent mayhem were, say, welfare funds to dry up or the currency to hyperinflate.

The national media generally like to turn their gaze away from such matters; the local media really can’t avoid reporting on it.

Here’s a story from Atlanta today of tens of thousands of homeless African-Americans seeking public housing applications:

Thirty thousand people showed up to receive Section 8 housing applications in East Point Wednesday, suffering through hours in the hot sun, angry flare-ups in the crowd and lots of frustration and confusion for a chance to receive a government-subsidized apartment.

The massive event sometimes descended into a chaotic mob scene filled with anger and impatience. Some 62 people needed medical attention and 20 of them were transported to a hospital, authorities said. A baby went into a seizure in the heat and was stabilized at a hospital. People were removed on stretchers and when a throng of people who had been waiting hours in a line were told to move to another line, people started pushing, shoving and cursing, witnesses said.

Still, officials of East Point declared the day a success. Nobody was arrested and nobody was seriously injured, they said. It was an assessment roundly challenged by many of the people who had to go through it.

Kim Lemish, executive director of the East Point Housing Authority, said the event marked the first time the city has offered Section 8 housing applications since 2002. The waiting list that lasted eight years had depleted, she said, and the agency was beginning a new one. So people braved all the physical difficulties just to get on a waiting list that could keep them waiting for years.

This comes a little over a year after a false rumor was spread among Atlanta Blacks via text messages about new Section 8 vouchers being on offer; much like today, thousands showed up at public facilities and various welfare offices around the city. (Just in case you’re wondering, yes, the homeless have cell phones.) Such an incident speaks not only to Black desperation but also the degree to which communications technology and social networking can facilitate spontaneous, paroxysmal “flash mobs.” (The piece I wrote last April about “Race Riots 2.0” is worth revisiting in this regard.)

Omar Thornton had so internalized the typical Leftist critique of Western society that only moments after committing his crime, he was already interpreting it as a righteous outburst against omnipresent Institutional Racism.   

Dispatcher: State Police.

Thornton: Is this 911?

Dispatcher: Yeah, can I help you?

Thornton: This is Omar Thornton, the, uh, the shooter over in Manchester.

Dispatcher: Yes, where are you, sir?

Thornton: I'm in the building. Uh, you probably want to know the reason why I shot this place up. This place here is a racist place.

Dispatcher: Yup, I understand that

Thornton: They treat me bad over here, and they treat all the other black employees bad over here too, so I just take it into my own hands and I handled the problem — I wish I coulda got more of the people.

Dispatcher: Yeah. Are you armed, sir? Do you have a weapon with you?

Thornton: Oh yeah, I'm armed.

Dispatcher: How many guns do you have with you?

Thornton: I got one now, there's one out, one out in the uh, the uh, factory there.

Dispatcher: Yup. OK, sir.

Thornton: I'm not gonna kill nobody else, though.

Dispatcher: Yeah, we're gonna have to have you surrender yourself somehow here, not make the situation any worse, you know what I mean?

Thornton: These cops are gonna kill me.

Dispatcher: No they're not. We're just gonna have to get you to relax

Thornton: I'm relaxed, just calm down.

Dispatcher: … to have you, you know, turn yourself over.

Thornton: We're just talking, you're gonna play something on the news, you know I'm gonna be popular, right [inaudible] the right thing. SWAT team just rolled by in army gear. You don't know where I'm at, but, I don't know, maybe you can trace it from this phone call. But, yeah, these people here are crazy, they treat me bad from the start here, racist company. They treat me bad, I'm the only black driver they got here. They treat me bad over here, they treat me bad all the time.

Dispatcher: This is a horrible situation, I understand that…

Thornton: You don't need to calm me down, I'm already calmed down. I'm not gonna kill nobody else — I just want to tell my story so that you can play it back.

Dispatcher: You're gonna help me get you out of the building, OK?

Thornton: All right, I'm a, I get — don't worry about that, I got that taken care of, I don't need anybody to talk me into getting me out. …

Dispatcher: Where in the building are you, Omar?

Thornton: I'm not gonna tell you that. Where they find me, that's when everything will be over.

Dispatcher: Yeah, just, you know, where are you located, are you up in the offices?

Thornton: Where they fired me, everything be all right. … Manchester itself is a racist place.

Hat tip: Steve Sailer.

As Steve Sailer has demonstrated, the Omar Thornton situation is mostly being treated in the media as a story of white racists thankfully being eradicated from this earth. It’s larger significance can be condensed into this one telling side-story -- the owner of the company that allegedly harbored evil white employees bent on the racial denigration of Omar Thornton had previously sued his hometown because it wasn’t adequately educating its African-American populace:

Hartford Distributors President Sued Bloomfield In 2006 To Improve Schools For Black Students

The Hartford Courant

August 5, 2010

By David Owens

MANCHESTER -- Ross Hollander, the president of the beer distributorship where eight people were shot and killed Tuesday by a worker who'd just been fired, brought a lawsuit in 2006 to force his hometown of Bloomfield to improve schools for its predominantly black student population.

The family of the gunman in Tuesday's rampage, Omar Thornton, has claimed Thornton suffered racial prejudice while working as a driver and warehouse worker at Hartford Distributors Inc. at 131 Chapel Road, Manchester. Thornton killed himself as police closed in.

Union officials have said Thornton brought no racism allegations to them and filed no complaints with any state or federal agencies. Police said they found no evidence to support claims by Thornton's friends and family that racial slurs or graffiti scrawled in the bathrooms at the family-owned business.

Union officials have said that the Hollander family would not have tolerated any racist conduct.

 The lawsuit, brought by Hollander, Lewis B. Rome and James Michel, came after Bloomfield's town attorney ruled that a referendum vote authorizing the expenditure of $94 million to improve the town's schools was invalid.

"

The current student population in the Bloomfield public schools is 88 percent African-American, six percent white and six percent other minority," the lawsuit states. "Given that African-American children in this country have historically been educated in substandard facilities, the May 23, 2006, referendum seeks to give children who traditionally have not had access to the same educational facilities as their suburban counterparts. Bloomfield has the opportunity to reverse this traditional disadvantage by enacting the referendum as passed, as it would provide for modern facilities now enjoyed by its suburban counterparts."

Bloomfield schools, Hollander and the others argued, "lack the infrastructure necessary to allow students access to modern educational technology, damaging students' chances of attaining those skills necessary to compete in a modern technological workplace."

A U.S. District Court judge in Bridgeport ruled that the town attorney's ruling was faulty and reinstated the referendum results.

"

These buildings are not capable of preparing our kids for the 21^st Century," Hollander said after the court victory. "I hope the town fathers see this as an opportunity to step forward and do what they needed to do."

Attempts have been made to prove that racism pushed Mr. Thornton over the edge, which would apparently excuse the nine dead bodies, five of whom, Thornton told his mother on the phone, were but “dead racists.”

We are entering the dark days of what can ironically be called “Black Run America” (BRA), when the media has dictated a new hierarchy of crimes: the worst offense one can possibly be guilty of -- the crime from which no exoneration is possible -- is being a White racist.

In the case of the nine dead in Connecticut, the media has run with the story of a Black man being “discriminated” against as sufficient reason for engaging in wholesale slaughter.

In the world governed by BRA’s rules and edicts, it has now been shown that a mass-murder’s actions will be excused by playing the “but I just killed evil racists” card. The burden of proof now falls on the survivors to discredit such a heinous accusation.

Those who can see just grew exponentially.

Oh, and to the point of purported Black children having substandard educational opportunities: Black students do just as poorly in White schools (even when forced busing is mandated), and they do just as poorly when Black pupils receive outrageous allocation of resources per pupil.

And yes, they perform the same whether they are taught by Crusading White Pedagogues or over-eager Teach for America drones. The AP Test score breakdown among the differing racial groups illustrates this inconvenient truth all too well.

You Sir, have just won a Darwin Award!