Can't wait to see what the little Mestizo has to say about amnesty! (HT: LRC)
We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what's in it.
~Nancy Pelosi
As my past writings on the subject can attest, I think Obamacare is a horrendous, likely ruinous, social program. I can thus summon one and half cheers for the Republican leadership, which despite having backed George W. Bush's unfunded Medicare extension but six years ago, has decided to come out strong against Obamacare, follow the Tea Partiers, and try to "kill the bill."
As a friend wrote to me in an email:
Things can always get worse no matter how much the current system sucks. We should applaud the Republicans here for not trying to reach out and do something "bipartisan." Give me spineless slimeballs over true-believing liberals.There's truth to that ... but there is also a way in which a political opposition, even a forthright and unwavering one, can do serious intellectual damage to a cause by essentially agreeing with the premises of its adversary and not actually defining what is wrong with the other side.
I just saw Anita Dunn on Meet the Press say we have to pass health care reform because we need to cut costs. How is the bill that’s being voted on tonight supposed to do this? According to CBS News’ report on the legislation,
Major consumer safeguards take effect in 2014. Insurers prohibited from denying coverage to people with medical problems or charging them more. Higher premiums for women would be banned. Starting this year, insurers would be forbidden from placing lifetime dollar limits on policies and from denying coverage to children because of pre-existing medical problems.
This means that insurers will have to charge everybody equally, regardless of health. The healthiest individual will pay the same amount as the most gluttonous pig. This is socialism, no matter how you look at it.
While I get that, how does anybody even pretend that this will reduce health care costs? Obviously forcing a lot of people that the insurers don’t consider good risks into policies at the same price per head as everybody else will only make things more expensive for those who currently have coverage. This is why Massachusetts has the highest health care premiums in the country.
Democrats seem to disagree on whether they have the votes or not so there's still hope.
There are two possible explanations of what the Democrats are doing here. Perhaps they're trying to destroy the insurance industry so that government will have to step in and "solve" the latest problem its created with an actual public plan. Or, they're so ignorant of economics they don't understand what causes prices to rise and fall. They simply believe that what we pay for things depends on how much state benevolence there is to counteract corporate greed. I believe that the smarter ones are banking on the former, while the majority don't really know what they're doing.
In other news, I got some constructive feedback regarding my first few podcasts -- apparently my Samson COIU microphone left a whole lot to be desired in terms of volume and timbre. And so, I just went out and purchased a new Blue "Snowball" (which despite its funny name, looks like a scary miniature Death Star) and the sound is great -- enjoy!
A man much smarter and accomplished than I recently stirred up controversy with his scathing column on the divergent interests of the United States and Israel. Most Americans don't realize quite how humiliating the Israel Doctrine is to the United States and its reputation. Take, for example, Ehud Olmert's boasts after the US did an about-face on a Gaza cease-fire resolution at the UN in early 2009. The story:
Bebe of Conservative Heritage Times sums it up:
AltRight Information Service
Most Popular
- Most Read
- Most Commented
-
Golden Dawn Sheds Light On Itself
By Dimitrios Papageorgiou -
Race War?
By Andy Nowicki -
Rethinking Colonialism
By Siryako Akda







