Three, I can’t figure out what makes Beck congenial to a rightwing movement, if that is an accurate description of his followers. Most of what he says is incoherent and except for nonstop invectives against the spendthrift government, he has exceedingly strange views for someone on the “far right.” He goes on and on about fascist dangers, lavishes extravagant praise on Martin Luther King, bewails America’s history of racism and gushes over designated minorities. Beck is particularly incensed against those who interfered with Radical Republican Reconstruction, and he has been skewering the late Robert Byrd since his passing for having hindered the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. But when I ask self-described conservatives who is their favorite public figure, Beck’s name invariably comes up first.
Obviously those who write for this website, or for VDARE, would never be given enough public exposure to rise to Beck’s prominence. And I would never expect to see a presentation of the Reconstruction era on FOX that didn’t sound like the NAACP venting. But among those who do pass muster with the liberal-neocon ruling class, is a repentant druggie and GOP shill the closest we can get to “rightwing” media balance? If that is the case, then the disgust that John Derbyshire has famously expressed for the “talk-show Right” may be entirely on target. I, for one, find all of this as odious as John does. And I can’t determine why anyone would think that antifascist noisemaking is recognizably rightwing. The game of beating up on Obama while shamelessly fawning on minorities is a Republican, not a rightwing practice.









