Margaret Mead’s bad feminist anthropology influenced generations of “social scientists,” psychologists, writers and policy makers. Writers like Steven Pinker have noted that her “descriptions of peace-loving New Guineans and sexually nonchalant Samoans were based on perfunctory research and turned out to be almost perversely wrong.” (The Blank Slate, 2002) Yet, in papers written about the problem of “compulsive masculinity” from the 60s and 70s, Mead was cited enthusiastically by academics who desperately wanted to believe that humans are naturally peaceful and it is merely “society” or “socially constructed masculinity” that makes men violent. These bad ideas based on bad science still influence our most prominent thinkers and policy-makers today.
On top of all of this, the Gods of Science keep re-arranging the damn Food Pyramid. They can’t even agree on what we should eat.
It’s not that scientific inquiry is completely futile or unhelpful. We who use word processing software on laptop computers cannot claim to be primitives proper. But it is this fickleness of the Scientific Gods on High that recommends we remain skeptical about their latest Unbending Truth and look first to history and tradition for guidance. History itself can be viewed as the biggest scientific experiment of all, revealing what does and does not work for humans, and giving us hints as to why. Science sometimes proves us wrong, and sometimes it proves us right, and sometimes The Gods of Science change their minds. When Science deals with people, it is at its most biased -- as when the deathless Gods favor their own kin. Scientists are people, too, so they all have a horse in the race. However, the Truth of human nature will out and like Fate, it will have its way. A few decades of bad science and mis-education won’t change that in the long run.







